Switching gears, I have a TS-459 Pro II on the latest firmware, do depending on your model and firmware, your milage may vary. Basically, download station will become obsolete and that's a big QNAP selling point. Now that TPB has dumped torrent links and soon others will follow, not having magnet support will become an actual ding in the press for QNAP when comparing to Synology, etc. Still, it ** that QNAP has been asleep at the wheel regarding download station not being able to accept magnet links. If I remove the max download quota it peaks to + 90% proc load. With 10 downloads the results are the same. With two downloads proc: 45 - 65%, with 57% avg, mem: 25.1. I had the same settings for Qget, because the issues there where the same. I did limit the download speed to 1200Kb/s max, because above that speed it becomes inresponsive. I'm running 2.22 (QPKG) and remote GUI 3.2. I wonder why is taking them so long for QNAP to implement magnet link within Download Station while their competitors like Synology, Asus and Buffalo to name a few have implement theirs? At one stage I even have 10 torrents in the queue and the processor utilization has never reached 80%. I thought the Download Station is the most reliable torrent client in QNAP. I also use Transmission Remote GUI version 2.2. These are the QPKG I used: Optware version 0.99.163 and Transmission version 2.42-b1. Not sure if this is a configuration issue or I have an old box. When Transmission is disabled, the processor utilization is back to normal. And most occasion I can't even access the QNAP via the web. Processor utilization is constantly hovering between 80% - 100%. But I find it too unstable when downloading only two magnet links. A detailed how to can be found here: magnet support for your qnap using Transmission It is way faster than Qget has ever been. Since nothing changed I installed the Transmission QPKG and the remote Transmission UI and I told Firefox that magnet links should be opened using Transmission. Markv wrote:A lot of people have been wanting this ( since 2009.)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |